Understanding the Legal Distinction Under Criminal Procedure
Criminal law recognises that not all offences have the same gravity or societal impact. While certain offences involve purely personal disputes and allow legal settlement, others are considered offences against society where private compromise is legally irrelevant. This distinction is reflected in the classification of offences as compoundable and non-compoundable under Indian criminal law.
Meaning of Compounding of Offences
Compounding of an offence refers to a legal process where the victim and the accused enter into a lawful compromise, resulting in the termination of criminal proceedings. Once an offence is validly compounded, the accused is acquitted, and the case stands finally closed.
Compounding is not a matter of discretion or convenience. It is permitted strictly in accordance with statutory provisions.
Statutory Framework
The compounding of offences is governed by Section 320 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. This provision exhaustively lists the offences that may be compounded, identifies the person competent to compound them, and specifies whether court permission is required.
Any offence not included in Section 320 CrPC is, by default, non-compoundable.
Compoundable Offences
Compoundable offences are generally minor in nature and involve personal harm rather than societal injury. In such cases, the law permits settlement in order to promote reconciliation and avoid unnecessary criminal litigation.
Categories of Compoundable Offences
Certain offences may be compounded without the permission of the court. In these cases, the victim can directly enter into a compromise with the accused, and the proceedings come to an end. Examples include voluntarily causing hurt under Section 323 of the Indian Penal Code, defamation under Section 500 IPC, and criminal trespass.
Other offences require the permission of the court before compounding. The court must satisfy itself that the compromise is voluntary, genuine, and not contrary to public interest. Examples include voluntarily causing grievous hurt under Section 325 IPC and certain assault-related offences.
Once an offence is lawfully compounded, the accused stands acquitted, and no further criminal proceedings may be initiated in respect of the same offence.
Also Read- Difference Between Bailable and Non-Bailable Offences
Non-Compoundable Offences
Non-compoundable offences are serious crimes that affect society at large. In such cases, the State assumes the role of prosecutor, and private settlement between parties does not terminate criminal proceedings.
Even where the victim expresses a willingness to forgive the accused, the prosecution continues, and the court is bound to adjudicate the matter in accordance with law.
Examples of non-compoundable offences include murder under Section 302 IPC, rape under Section 376 IPC, dowry death under Section 304B IPC, and offences relating to corruption or terrorism.
Quashing of Non-Compoundable Offences
Non-compoundable offences cannot be settled under Section 320 CrPC. However, High Courts may exercise inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to quash criminal proceedings in exceptional circumstances.
Such powers are typically exercised in cases involving matrimonial disputes, commercial transactions with criminal overtones, or purely private disputes that do not impact public interest. This power is discretionary and does not apply to serious or heinous offences, irrespective of any compromise between the parties.
It is important to note that quashing of proceedings is not equivalent to compounding of offences.
Key Differences Between Compoundable and Non-Compoundable Offences
Compoundable offences are minor in nature, primarily affect individual victims, and permit settlement with or without court permission depending on the offence. In contrast, non-compoundable offences are serious crimes where the victim’s consent is legally irrelevant, settlement does not terminate proceedings, and prosecution is driven by public interest.
Also Read- What is a Zero FIR?
Common Misconceptions
A compromise between parties does not automatically cancel an FIR, as an FIR is a State action. Monetary settlement cannot legalise the termination of proceedings in non-compoundable offences. Further, not all matrimonial offences are compoundable, though some may be quashed by courts in appropriate cases.
Compoundable offences involve personal wrongs and allow statutory settlement, whereas non-compoundable offences involve societal harm and mandate prosecution. Compromise does not grant immunity, and judicial discretion cannot be claimed as a matter of right.
The criminal justice system prioritises public interest and the rule of law over private convenience.
Connect with us on Instagram – X – LinkedIn for daily updates, quizzes, and other materials.
