In a landmark judgment, the Supreme Court of India has drawn a firm line on anticipatory bail in cases under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) SC/ST Act. The Court has clarified that anticipatory bail can only be granted if, on the face of the FIR, it is clear that no offence under the Act is made out.
This ruling directly addresses concerns about the misuse of anticipatory bail provisions and reinforces the protective spirit of the SC/ST Act, which was designed to shield marginalized communities from caste-based atrocities.
Also Read- Supreme Court Upholds Nationwide Rollout of 20% Ethanol-Blended Petrol (E20)
The case, Kiran v. Rajkumar Jivraj Jain & Anr., came before a bench led by Chief Justice B.R. Gavai. The Bombay High Court had earlier granted anticipatory bail to an accused who allegedly used a casteist slur to publicly humiliate a complainant. The Supreme Court, however, overturned this decision, stressing that courts must not conduct “mini-trials” at the bail stage. Instead, judges should rely only on a first-impression reading of the FIR.
Importantly, the Court noted that in this case, a caste nexus was clearly visible. The accused’s use of a derogatory caste term was not casual but intended to humiliate the complainant. This, the Court held, was enough to establish a prima facie offence under the Act.
Also Read- Backlog of Judicial Cases in India: A Looming Crisis Demanding Urgent Action
By tightening the scope of anticipatory bail, the Court has reaffirmed the legislative intent of the SC/ST Act—to act as a strong deterrent against caste-based abuse and violence. The ruling ensures that those accused of serious caste atrocities cannot easily escape accountability before trial.
The message is unambiguous: the law exists to protect the vulnerable, and any attempt to dilute its force will not be entertained.
Connect with us on Instagram – X – LinkedIn for daily updates, quizzes, and other materials
